Central Connecticut
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,074  Madeline Mondo JR 21:33
1,157  Dawn Hubbell JR 21:38
1,628  Megan Brawner FR 22:08
1,723  Angelia Rafter FR 22:14
2,284  Kaitlyn Stevens FR 22:56
2,643  Olivia Mondo SR 23:31
2,858  Morgan Ricci JR 24:06
3,185  Kailyn Accetura FR 25:44
3,279  Shannon Thompson FR 26:48
National Rank #231 of 348
Northeast Region Rank #32 of 44
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Madeline Mondo Dawn Hubbell Megan Brawner Angelia Rafter Kaitlyn Stevens Olivia Mondo Morgan Ricci Kailyn Accetura Shannon Thompson
Umass Minuteman Invitational 09/09 1373 21:17 22:43 23:24 23:15 24:58 26:10 26:44
Ted Owen Invitational 09/23 1280 21:14 21:45 22:20 23:45 23:36 22:54 24:59 25:04 27:03
Northeast Conference Championship 10/28 1269 21:42 21:26 21:49 22:02 23:55 23:39 24:15 25:51 26:39
Northeast Region Championships 11/10 1228 21:39 21:26 21:44 21:47 22:27 23:54 23:37





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 29.9 866 0.2 0.5 0.4 1.0 1.7 3.0 6.8 9.2 13.9 17.7 22.9



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Madeline Mondo 124.5
Dawn Hubbell 134.9
Megan Brawner 184.5
Angelia Rafter 193.3
Kaitlyn Stevens 233.2
Olivia Mondo 251.9
Morgan Ricci 268.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 0.2% 0.2 21
22 0.5% 0.5 22
23 0.4% 0.4 23
24 1.0% 1.0 24
25 1.7% 1.7 25
26 3.0% 3.0 26
27 6.8% 6.8 27
28 9.2% 9.2 28
29 13.9% 13.9 29
30 17.7% 17.7 30
31 22.9% 22.9 31
32 15.3% 15.3 32
33 5.6% 5.6 33
34 1.6% 1.6 34
35 0.5% 0.5 35
36 0.1% 0.1 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0